From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-06 18:00:56
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
> As someone working in the game industry, I can say that right now, even
> if we use fully use Boost in our tools, in our engine we use Boost with
> parsimony (typically libraries .hpp without .lib; easier to control code
> size) and also disable RTTI since the memory overhead is not worth the
> cost. A performant state machine mechanism working without RTTI would
> be interesting.
I always suspected that -fno-rtti is still widely used :)
This example seems to work with g++ -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
while this does not
(you can also find them in $BOOST_ROOT/libs/mpl/example/fsm).
-- Alexander Nasonov
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk