[boost] Re: FSM Review

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-07 08:38:34

"Iain K. Hanson" <ikh_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 07:29:21PM +0300, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>> Iain K. Hanson wrote:
>> > I'd love to see a DSL ( Domain Specific Language ) for state charts that
>> > generated Alexsey style FSMs with states able to be defined in seperate
>> > compilation units. This would solve the scaleabilty problems.
>> 
>> If you're talking about this
>> http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/mpl/example/fsm/player2.cpp
>> then there is nothing to put in separate TUs because states are numbers.
>> Probably, you mixed states up with transitions.
>
> No. I was thinking states which implies a rework of the design. It was
> the idea of making this design scalable that intregued me.

I don't think that would be too hard to do.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com