[boost] Re: indirecter_unary, indirecter_binary

From: Matthias Kaeppler (nospam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-07 10:35:22

David Abrahams wrote:
> Matthias Kaeppler <nospam_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> 
> Here's mine: you should not include boost/type_traits.hpp.  Use the
> specific granular headers you need.
> 

Okay, thanks.
But what about the overall class design? Is there still unnecessary 
overhead or even examples where they don't work as supposed?

-- 
Matthias Kaeppler