From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 12:32:04
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> I believe this version is much less intuitive. optional<T> v is still
> value of type T which may or may not be present. Accordingly when we
> print it we print the value if it present or print nothing if it not.
This isn't very useful. The output cannot be read back, and when printing a
sequence of optionals much of the information is lost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk