From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 15:08:07
Caleb Epstein wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:47:36 -0700, Jonathan Turkanis
> <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Thanks for your feedback. would_block is unix-y too, no?
> I'd say no, since it describes the concept (the operation would block)
> and not a system-level error code (EAGAIN). Admittedly there is
> EWOULDBLOCK on some systems as well, but thats not what I had in mind
> when considering the name "would_block".
I don't want to get distracted by the issue of why eagain may be inappropriate;
I'd like to focus instead on what sounds good. I'm glad to hear that you like
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk