Re: [boost] [1.33.0]: Some Moderation Please.

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 16:35:48

At Tuesday 2005-03-08 13:50, I wrote:
[deleted as irrelevant]

>Likewise, I believe the success of C++ is directly tied to how well boost 
>seduces (boost reacts faster than the committee).

that SHOULD read......:

Likewise, I believe the success of C++ is directly tied to how well boost 
succeeds (boost reacts faster than the committee).

I'd typoed both success and succeeds with a single c.  when the spell 
checker complained about sucess, it picked success as a correction.  then 
it complained about suceeds and I just said OK (assuming, obviously 
incorrectly) that it would pick succeeds (silly me) sorry for any confusion.

[also irrelevant]

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"