From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 22:21:57
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> David Abrahams writes:
>>Or it doesn't iconify well, just for example.
> Never understood why it's important. What's the use case for it
> besides that smallish icon in the browser's address line that hardly
> anybody cares about? 95% of all the logos out there don't iconify well
> or at all.
Let me second this. I think this is important enough to be
emphasized. I think logos and icons are *two* different things.
I'd say that the ability of a logo to be iconfified is a
desirable, but not essential, trait.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk