[boost] Re: [FOREACH] new version available, testers needed

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 15:05:18

"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:

<snip>

> template<typename T>
> inline BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_result_iterator<T>::type adl_begin(T &t)
> {
>     #if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(0x564))
>     return boost::begin(t);
>     #else
>     using boost::begin;
>     typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_result_iterator<T>::type type;
>     return type(begin(t));
>     #endif
> }
>
> template<typename T>
> inline BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_result_iterator<T>::type adl_end(T &t)

Either you didn't see my recent argument on boost-users that ADL is
too common an acronym to be used to disambiguate such ADL
customization points, or you didn't buy it, or...?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com