From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-10 15:27:13
Caleb Epstein wrote:
>>>as for anything still working on VC++6.0, I'm already on record as
>>>saying boost should drop this ancient compiler.
>>I agree, however we have too large project here to "just" move it to the
>>newer compiler. It takes some time and determination ...
> Maybe you should consider a less compiler-intensive implementation
> then. The URL below has links to a number of alternatives which will
we are rather going to use subset of Boost. In fact, we already use
Regex alone, just as John suggested in this thread earlier.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk