From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-11 01:27:28
At Thursday 2005-03-10 19:27, you wrote:
>On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:51, Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
> > as for anything still working on VC++6.0, I'm already on record as saying
> > boost should drop this ancient compiler.
>There's another compiler which I'm porting boost to that is mostly bug-to-bug
>compatible to that from VC6 and that is the one supplied with embedded VC4. I
>believe that this is currently the main platform for win CE development, so
>unfortunately this compiler is far from dead.
I am utterly baffled as to what "they" are thinking at Microsoft. This is
one time they have really flipped their collective lids. Releasing SP6 was
bad enough, but this "piece of work" they call VC4 is completely uncalled
for. To borrow a phrase from Prostestnik(sp) the Vogon, "Death's too good
>If there was a good alternative, I'd switch any moment, but I'm afraid there
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk