|
Boost : |
From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-11 12:16:24
From: "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]>
>
> I just verified that Borland 5.6.4 complains of ambiguity when safe-bool and
> char conversions are combined. The same is true with a void* conversion instead
> of safe-bool. It works with a bool conversion instead of safe-bool, but this
> makes me a bit nervous. I'll have to wait until I have a bunch of filters
> implemented.
I have no idea how old that compiler is or how important it is to
your user base. Can you ignore it like so many are now ignoring
MSVC 6.x?
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk