From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-11 20:05:43
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>> I'll see what I can do :-)
>>> Great. I have to say, I probably didn't consider it enough. I think
>>> maybe 67 was most appealing because its execution was top-notch.
>>> There are few other logos in the contest that were as polished. This
>>> just goes to show that a good idea with sub-par execution will
>>> probably make a negative impression on at least some people.
>> True.. In my case it was a matter of time.. That one was one of the
>> firsts one I did, when there was no contest. So I wasn't really trying
>> to make it polished, just to get the concept out.
>> This brings up the question of what we do about updated logos? Do we
>> replace the existing entries? Do we have another contest? Do we add
>> another entry? Not sure what is really fair to the other contributors.
> I say we let the contest finish as planned, since its almost over
> (considering when it was first announced). If the selected logo
> can't be adjusted so that most of are happy with it, we can allow
> people to modify their submitted designs and submit completely new
> The logo contest rules didn't say that the selected logo waw
> guaranteed to be used for any specific amount of time, so I don't
> think the winner can complain if the logo is not used on the
> website, or if it is only used for a few days.
True. We did promise the winner a T-shirt ;-)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk