From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-12 15:44:37
Andreas Huber wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
I forgot to respond to part of your message.
>> What I would like to see in the rationale is a
>> comparison of a small handful (2-5) of alternate implementation
>> technique, either approaches taken by other libraries or approaches
>> you tried yourself early in development, together with an explanation
>> of why they fail to satisfy the requirements.
> That's interesting. I was under the impression that exactly such a
> list of alternate implementation techniques would not satisfy you,
> because it would in no way show that the design I chose is the best
Why not? That would be the main point.
> And performance was your biggest concern, wasn't it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk