From: Matthew Vogt (mattvogt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-13 05:05:07
David Abrahams wrote:
>>This library seems to differ - it appears that there are criticisms
>>of the library's performance characteristics, but no-one is pointing
>>to alternative libraries that solve these problems (albeit they may
>>be deficient in other ways). Similarly, I haven't noticed any
>>suggestions for specific techniques that might be used to improve
>>the performance of the current submission.
> To the contrary, in previous threads I have posted several examples of
> small FSM libraries with either O(1) or O(#outgoing transitions)
> dispatch. Alexander Nasonov has also posted some examples using a
> very different approach.
These techniques do not address the issues of state machines dispersed across
multiple translation units, or support for orthogonal states, do they?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk