Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-14 00:56:22

Next message: Eric Niebler: "[boost] [range] rationale for transform_range() algorithm?"
Previous message: Scott Woods: "Re: [boost] Re: Re: Sockets: proposal for a library design"
In reply to: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] [test] still regressions with IsDebuggerPresent()"

"Stefan Slapeta" <stefan_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:d046o5$4ul$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
>
> There are still regressions caused by a missing definition of
> IsDebuggerPresent(). These failures have been introduced by the recent
> changes in boost.test. What is to do here?
>
> see http://tinyurl.com/6vdo9

I just was able to compile this test using cw 8.3. You are telling me that
9.4 "forgot" about this function?

Gennadiy

Next message: Eric Niebler: "[boost] [range] rationale for transform_range() algorithm?"
Previous message: Scott Woods: "Re: [boost] Re: Re: Sockets: proposal for a library design"
In reply to: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] [test] still regressions with IsDebuggerPresent()"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk