Re: [boost] Re: [addressof] patch for Borland

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-14 17:05:13

Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>> 
>>> It's not that important, I was just curious. What's more important
>>> is that we don't seem to have a test case for the functionality.
>>> addressof_test is pretty basic.
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, that's an oversight on my part. I've attached a patch to
>> addressof_test.cpp to test for taking the address of an array. I can
>> confirm that these new tests pass with VC7.1 and gcc 3.3.3 (cygwin).

Great! Please go ahead and commit if you haven't already.