From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-14 17:05:13
Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>> It's not that important, I was just curious. What's more important
>>> is that we don't seem to have a test case for the functionality.
>>> addressof_test is pretty basic.
>> Yes, that's an oversight on my part. I've attached a patch to
>> addressof_test.cpp to test for taking the address of an array. I can
>> confirm that these new tests pass with VC7.1 and gcc 3.3.3 (cygwin).
Great! Please go ahead and commit if you haven't already.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk