From: Johannes Brunen (jbrunen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-15 11:53:14
David B. Held and Paul A Bristow wrote:
>> It will be a sad day when Boost rejects a good library because
>> another library in a different part of the design space is
>> theoretically faster.
> IMO this hits the nail on the head.
> As with too many reviews, there have been very interesting,
> but essentially speculative, alternative ideas,
> produced not during the 'proposed library' development phase,
> but somewhat destructively and at the 'last minute'.
> These should not be a reason for rejection,
> but should spur development of different
> (and hopefully in some ways better) ideas to submit in future.
I would like to second that.
With best regards
Tel.: 02166 / 955 789
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
Version: AVK 15.0.3667 from 15.03.2005
Virus news: www.antiviruslab.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk