From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-16 04:35:32
Andy Little writes:
> The problem: For some Integral Constants values mpl::divides<A.,B>
Yep. Note that it's no different than
int divides( int A, int B )
return A / B;
> The solution: A new operator... mpl::rational_divides<A,B> When it is
> desired not to truncate, this form will preserve the fractional part
> by if necessary converting to a rational number. With this operator in
> place it is also possible to 'reduce' rationals to integers where
> possible and further to keep integral constants as integral types by
> default, knowing that conversion will be automatic if a fraction is
> required to prevent loss of precision.
Could you provide a specific use case where the above would be preferable
over something like
mpl::divide< to_rational<A>,B >
> No mpl::divides<A.,B> is available if A or B is a rational types,
> because it is assumed that if you are using rationals you require the
> fraction preserving behaviour.
I'd assume that 'divides' on rational types actually wouldn't truncate
anything. Why one would prefer to have a separate metafunction for
doing the right thing instead of simply overriding the standard one?
> A numeric_cast to an integral type can be used to solve this where
> Errors of using divides<A,B> on rationals will show at compile time.
> Thanks to Alexey Gurtovoy for the conversion mechanism
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk