From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-16 12:07:14
AJ8ih0MJXLu4umRrhBw7YSD2E=) wrote (abridged):
> > However, it yields hash values for int * different to the values for
> > char *, so with the current design aims we can't use it.
> It also has the undesirable side-effect of making the hash value
> depend on the machine endianness. The same set of integers would hash
> to different values on (say) Sparc and Intel machines.
True - another variant of the stability issue.
-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk