|
Boost : |
From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-19 12:21:14
In-Reply-To: <003a01c52a54$a90c6b30$6601a8c0_at_pdimov>
pdimov_at_[hidden] (Peter Dimov) wrote (abridged):
> > I do appreciate the benefits of stability. What isn't clear is
> > whether it trumps hash quality. This is a judgement call, in that it
> > partly depends on which issue is more important to you.
>
> Both issues are important to me.
They conflict. There is a tradeoff between them. So we have to choose
which is more important.
I was concerned partly that the wrong choice might be made, but mostly
because the tradeoff wasn't even being acknowledged.
-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk