From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-20 07:56:47
Dave Harris wrote:
> Err, I wasn't asking you whether it was correct. I'm not asking for
> assistance with that old code; I found and fixed the problems long ago.
I wasn't trying to fix your code. I was pointing out that for some
equality functions, the hash function you gave is ideal. I think there
was an example of this in my mail. Fixing your case would break it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk