From: Brian Braatz (brianb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-21 13:11:41
I would also like to request anyone who looks at this or spends time
with it share on the list what they have learned.
So far, it looks like it is gcc only as shipped, so porting is one area
that needs analysis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> On Behalf Of Brian Braatz
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 9:22 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: RE: [boost] Re: google going open source
> Just quickly- I am making good progress on app integration and adding
> the Profiler library by Chris Diggins.
> I will be mailing out more info in the next few weeks.
> Additionally- a quick look at below looks like it would be something
> that would add value to profiler lib. I plan on taking a deeper look
> that and will report back what I see. I want to REALLY spend some time
> with below to understand it better\ see how it could fit in with
> profiler being worked on.
> THANK YOU for sending this out, very interesting....
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> > On Behalf Of Martin Wille
> > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 12:50 AM
> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: Re: [boost] Re: google going open source
> > Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> > > "Bronek Kozicki" <brok_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > > news:4239ED44.5090508_at_rubikon.pl...
> > > | under BSD 2.0 license
> > > | http://code.google.com/
> > > |
> > >
> > > Hm...would anyone volenteer to boostify
> > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/goog-perftools/,
> > Can't be done, due to the license.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk