Re: [boost] Re: [review results] hash functions accepted

From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-21 22:35:15

In-Reply-To: <d1na66$6p2$1_at_[hidden]>
daniel_at_[hidden] (Daniel James) wrote (abridged):
> > 5. change implementation of hash values for pointers so undefined 
> > behavior is gone (and consider adding  x + (x >> 3) )
> 
> I'm going to do that.

Is it worth considering using x + x / sizeof(*p) instead?

-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK