Re: [boost] Re: [review results] hash functions accepted

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-22 15:00:49

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>
> So I think that we are just getting a false sense of security out of
> leaving the default empty.

OK, let's leave equivalence out of it. What is the default for an arbitrary 
object x of user-defined type X? You claim that it's hash_range( x.begin(), 
x.end() ), but this is obviously incorrect in the vast majority of cases. I 
claim that there is no default.