From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-23 17:59:48
Rob Stewart wrote:
>> The requirements should be "distinguish accepted boost libraries from
>> things someone hopes will be in Boost, someday." Beyond that, I
>> don't care.
> If your laissez faire approach is acceptable to folks, then I
> agree. If something a little more formal is desirable, then
> something else is needed. I'd like to see some consensus from
> folks on the list.
I agree with Dave that there is no need for a formal convention.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk