From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-24 11:48:33
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> N.B. libstdc++ had a compare_and_swap primitive until a couple of years ago,
> when it was removed because nothing was using it and it was a headache
> when porting libstdc++ to new architectures.
> I'm going to ask about the possibility of resurrecting that
Do the right thing and tell'em to introduce atomic<> with IBM style
CAS (with msync decorators of course) and etceteras as lowest common
denominator (RIP i386). Arch specific stuff (like load_reserved()
and store_conditional() member functions) shall be available too
(less portability... but global warming matters, they say ;-) ).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk