Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-24 14:40:08

Next message: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: [range] update on ADL hooks"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [range] update on ADL hooks"
In reply to: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] Boost policy on relying on std library implementation defined behaviour"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "[boost] Re: Boost policy on relying on std library implementationdefined behaviour"

"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Is there a reason to avoid providing a uniform interface to
> implementation-defined standard library features?

No.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: [range] update on ADL hooks"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [range] update on ADL hooks"
In reply to: Jonathan Turkanis: "[boost] Boost policy on relying on std library implementation defined behaviour"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "[boost] Re: Boost policy on relying on std library implementationdefined behaviour"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk