Re: [boost] pure virtual singleton

From: Dan Rosen (dan.rosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-24 15:38:07

Right you are. I guess that's what I'm missing, among other things :P
dr

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:14:50 -0500, Jody Hagins
<jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Just a thought, but I might be totally missing something

> A pure virtual destructor in singleton_base does not require the derived
> class to implement a destructor.