From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-29 09:03:06
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Is there any plans to split call_traits? I really need only reference
>> type trait. Shouldn't it be part of type traits lib? Is there an
>> alternative already in there?
> Yes, add_reference does the same thing, we should really add an
> add_const_reference as well.
Sorry, I actually need param_type. Reference indeed is just
Any idea in this direction?