Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-29 10:42:51

"Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Microsoft-specific "bugfeatures" are generally not in the area of my
> interests. However I do realize that, on the Microsoft compiler, this might
> look much more attractive then anything Peder and I have implemented. And
> even though I realize that this might be a serious competition, I would feel
> really bad not to mention this here:
> Thoughts?
> In particular, how do people feel about implementing someting for some
> particular compiler using specific "features" of this compiler? Should this
> be acceptable?

Sure, as long as the rest of the implementation is portable. You can
hide any non-portable magic you want behind





Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at