From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-30 09:05:58
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > | BTW shouldn't it be
| > |
| > | using boost::begin;
| > | begin(r);
| > yes!
| > its irritating especially for boost authors because it dosn't wok
| > portable; putting the code into boost::begin()
| > solves that once and for all.
| What portability issue are you referring to? On what compilers is
| there a portability problem?
| I should note that old compilers like vc6 and vc7 don't support ADL
| for regular functions (just operators), so our approach, which puts
| the code into boost::begin(), doesn't work on those compilers anyway.
no, but the library writers still needs to deal with it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk