Re: [boost] [Filesystem] i18n

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-30 21:53:10

At 05:28 PM 3/30/2005, Peter Dimov wrote:

 >Martin wrote:
 >> - non-throwing is_* functions. I find it very inconvenient and error
 >> prune to put try/catch around each is_directory call. Calling
 >> is_accessible before every other is_* function is an option but not
 >> much easier and still leaves a risk for an exception if another
 >> process is accessing the file.
 >
 >Did is_accessible get added, after all?

Yes.

 > That's bad. Let's remove it before
 >it gets standardized and it's too late. :-)

?

--Beman