Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-31 06:32:22

Next message: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Re: [Filesystem] i18n"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem] i18n"
In reply to: Tushar: "Re: [boost] Classpath to C++ conversion"
Next in thread: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] Classpath to C++ conversion"

Tushar wrote:

>>Agreed. STL not being (entirely) OO is not a problem in any way.
>
> It is. It makes it difficult to document/design things with UML and
> related documentation tools like doxygen or javadoc

I hope you're not suggesting we should restrict the design of libraries
to what you think is supported by UML and by the documentation tools you
mentioned.

Regards,
m

Next message: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Re: [Filesystem] i18n"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem] i18n"
In reply to: Tushar: "Re: [boost] Classpath to C++ conversion"
Next in thread: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] Classpath to C++ conversion"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk