[boost] Re: Boost policy on relying onstdlibraryimplementationdefined behaviour

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-31 14:18:25

Beman Dawes wrote:
> "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:d22hfp$7e9$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
>
>> Two possibilities I can think of are as follows (I'm writing this
>> off the top of
>> my head -- I'll need to give it more thought):

>> How do these strike you?
>
> I started to answer your question as asked, but then realized it
> isn't my opinion that counts, but rather the LWG's collective
> opinion, which will be heavily influenced by the implementers.

Sounds reasonable (but I can't help wondering what your own opinion was ;-) )

> So
> maybe what we ought to do over the next two weeks is to build up a
> list of questions, then ask the LWG in Lillehammer for their preferences.

Unfortunately, my plans have changed and I won't be in Lillehammer, but I can
still help you draw up the list.

> Action plan for the next couple of days is to read chapter 27, and
> try to identify as many issues as possible.

Sounds good.

> --Beman

Jonathan