From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-03 20:45:44
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:35:02 -0400, David Abrahams wrote
>> "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:33:31 -0600, Rene Rivera wrote
>> >> Allen wrote:
>> >> > The width is fixed, I think that's bad.
>> >> Why?
>> > I agree with Allen -- fixed width is bad. Basically it wastes
>> > space on my monitor and forces me to scroll when I shouldn't have
>> > to.
>> But without a fixed width the lines of text tend to become
>> unreadably long.
> Unreadable for you, but maybe not for me -- if the page is designed
> to just flow then everyone can set the browser size however they
> wish and the page will wrap to fit. This is how the current pages
True. It's just a shame that browsers maximize to this silly
horizontal aspect ratio all of our screens use.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk