|
Boost : |
From: Rogier van Dalen (rogiervd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-04 06:51:54
On Apr 4, 2005 1:16 PM, Erik Wien <wien_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
> > But, whether you use std::string, std::vector, or
> > manually manage memory, it should be an implementation detail.
True.
> Exactly. We will probably go for std::vector for now, but since it is an
> implementation detail, changing this at a later time should not be a
> problem. (As long as it is found worthy of the effort in terms of
> efficiency that is)
basic_string has convenient and fast find* and replace methods though.
Regards,
Rogier
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk