|
Boost : |
From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-08 16:42:51
Miro Jurisic wrote:
[...]
> I think that given the choice of better performance and better safety we should
> err on the side of safety until the faster version is provable safe, not the
> other way around (as you seem to be suggesting).
Faster version doesn't become unsafe merely because a preliminary notice
"strongly recommends" some silliness not giving any reason for "strong
recommendation" whatsoever.
regards,
alexander.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk