From: Don G (dongryphon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-11 08:34:24
Thanks for the feedback! My guess without seeing the error messages
is the win::result helper class. It (incorrectly) relies on
<windows.h> if _WIN32 or __WIN32__ or WIN32 is defined. I've posted a
new errorinfo2.zip to the sandbox, but couldn't delete the old
version - permission denied :(
I don't understand for sure why the code compiled for me. If the
current version still doesn't compile, you could try adding
<winerror.h> right next to <windows.h> in errorinfo.hpp.
--- Paul A Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> A very brief (and probably incompetent) skirmish, with this
> somewhat interesting looking idea did not succeed in getting it to
> compile under MSVC Express as a pure console application
> (no Windows) - clearly not its main application.
> Paul A Bristow
> Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
> +44 1539 561830 +44 7714 330204
> mailto: pbristow_at_[hidden]
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> | [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Don G
> | Sent: 10 April 2005 00:33
> | To: boost
> | Subject: [boost] [errorinfo] RFC
> | Just curious if anyone has had a chance to look at the
> | or think about the previous email on this subject. I am looking
> | putting together a straw man for a general asynchronous library
> | shared_ptr<errorinfo> would play much better in that space than
> | shared_ptr<std::exception>.
> | Thanks for any feedback!
> | Best,
> | Don
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk