|
Boost : |
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-12 09:40:07
Maybe - but RTTI strings aren't portable. You might also want to look at
variant serialization checked into CVS
Robert Ramey
Tim Michals wrote:
> Yes, this can work, and is a straight forward implementation. But is
> there anyway to use the RTTI information? Or some how using the
> BOOST_CLASS_IMPLEMENTATION(my_class,
> boost::serialization::object_class_info) to add class name and
> reference this? Or something like the test_no_rrti.cpp example, but
> using rtti
> embedded infromation?
>
>
>
>> From: "Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]>
>> Reply-To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: [boost] Re: Serializing using RTTI
>> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:40:04 -0700
>>
>> How about the following?
>>
>> saveData( std::string fileInfo)
>> {
>> os << userSaveConfig;
>> if (userSaveConfig )
>> os << saveConfig;
>> if (optionSave)
>> os < saveOptions;
>> }
>>
>> getData(std::string fileInfo)
>> {
>> int userSaveConfig;
>> os >> userSaveConfig
>> if (userSaveConfig )
>> os << saveConfig;
>> if (optionSave)
>> os < saveOptions;
>> }
>>
>> Robert Ramey
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk