From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-13 10:56:29
Caleb Epstein wrote:
> On 4/13/05, Don G <dongryphon_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I also believe that non-blocking is an I/O only thing; it is not
>> needed for connect or accept.
> Not sure about the need for a non-blocking accept, but a non-blocking
> connect is a must-have.
I second that. :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk