From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-14 15:07:48
Rene Rivera wrote:
> I running the timing tests again, with some changes to see if I can
> get more representative numbers.
If you can get the assembly version to outperform the generic Win32 version,
you mean ;-)
But out of curiosity, what changes? I've been thinking to add a more
representative shared_ptr and weak_ptr timing tests. The _mt versions aren't
> But attached is the end result.
>> // detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp - g++ on 486+ or AMD64
You should probably fix this line...
>> // Copyright (c) 2001, 2002, 2003 Peter Dimov and Multi Media Ltd.
>> // Copyright 2004-2005 Peter Dimov
... and add your name here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk