From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes (larsbj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-17 13:23:34
brangdon_at_[hidden] (Dave Harris) writes:
| In-Reply-To: <188.8.131.52.2.20050417091210.0840a328_at_[hidden]>
| vawjr_at_[hidden] (Victor A. Wagner Jr.) wrote (abridged):
>> > The shear size of boost bothers me in that I don't want to burden
>> > my source code control system unnecessarily.
>> 21 meg isn't that much (for the headers)
| Actually it's quite a lot. This is a "new tool" issue - once any new tool
| is incorporated into the code, we have to keep it around for ever, even if
| it proves useless and we stop using it 6 months later. It's a barrier to
| entry, and it would be a lower barrier if boost took 1 meg or 10k.
But if you need all you need all...
In LyX we use a lot of stuff from Boost, but not all of it so we only
provide the headers that we actually need: ca. 8 Mb. And compressed
that should be ca. 1 Mb (maybe even less).
| Basically I am supporting the idea of splitting boost into a collection of
| small, independent packages.
But not being able to use boost libraries to implement boost libraries
seems very inconvenient.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk