[boost] Re: [hash] Expected behaviour of hashing quiet NaN?

From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-19 09:05:54

Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin <at> comsoft.de> writes:

> I was under the impression that hash functions would be part of the 
> upcoming release.

They almost certainly will be. But they're still not quite finished - the extra 
week before the freeze is very useful.

> >>Maybe you could change the tests to just print the hash values on stdout?
> > 
> > But then the results won't show up on the summary. At the moment it's more 
> > useful that the test summary shows me useful information.
> 
> Do you know about "always_show_run_output"? You just have to add 
> "<test-info>always_show_run_output" to your hash-test rule to always see 
> the output of the test runs.

No, I didnt know about it. Thanks.

Daniel