From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-19 13:18:19
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote
>> Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
>>>I was recently contacted by Tom Brinkman (the review wizard) and told that,
>>>since the authors of other libraries in the queue are not yet ready to
>>>start, the Typeof libraty is being moved to be the next one for the review.
>>I wonder why typeof was pushed ahead of FOREACH. It's ready. As you can
>>see from the Google cache of the review schedule page, FOREACH *was*
>>scheduled ahead of typeof.
>>Is there an explanation?
> I guess this is a question to Tom...
> I am well aware that FOREACH is sheduled before TYPEOF, and of course, if
> it's ready, it should go first.
I am still waiting for an answer to this question. Tom, why was TYPEOF
moved ahead of FOREACH in the review queue? And why was it done without
any discussion on the list?
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk