Boost logo

Boost :

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-22 09:48:11

On Apr 22, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

> Doug Gregor writes:
>> On Apr 22, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
>>> Basically, what I'm asking for is support for non-critical failures,
>>> still show as yellow in the detail view, don't make the library box
>>> turn
>>> yellow in the summary view. I think.
>> Would making the color of expected failures something that's not green
>> (everything's okay) and not yellow or red (something's broken) work
>> for
>> you?
> May be we should mark them gray -- as we do with "N/A" libraries;
> in some sense these tests do represent "not available" functionality.

That sounds like a great idea to me, but let's hear back from Peter


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at