From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-22 13:26:23
"Russell Hind" <rh_gmane_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> So far there are plans to propose Boost.Threads, Boost.Filesystem, and
>> Boost.Signals. As well as proposals for some of the more major libraries,
>> I personally hope someone will do a sweep through Boost looking at some
>> of the smaller utilities and helpers for a possible "Small Additions"
> Has anyone thought about boost.date_time? I believe this fills a lacking
> area of the standard as much as threads and filesystem.
There was a brief discussion of it at the LWG meeting, and there is
interest. So the ball is in the developer's court. Jeff?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk