From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 11:44:57
"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| At Saturday 2005-04-23 19:46, you wrote:
| >"Thorsten Ottosen" wrote:
| > > Besides, boost.date_time I think these other libs are good candidates
| > > (maybe
| > > with slight modifications):
| > >
| > > 2. optional
| > >
| >This would be very useful addition.
| >It would likely require update of algorithms, e.g. std::sort
| >to deal with containers of optionals.
| if we're going to consider updating any of the algorithms, why can't we
| somehow update them all so that somealg(c.begin(), c.end(),
| means exactly the same thing as:
| somealg(c, morepossibleargs)
Don't worry; I'll propose this as part óf my submission of boost.range.