[boost] Re: Re: TR2 and C++0x heads up

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 08:09:15

> I see it like this: we are very limited in resources in the library 
> working
> group
> and we want to focus on libraries that can be used by as many users as
> possible.
> And that means a policy-based smart pointer is probably not going into the
> standard.

I don't see any grounds to this statement. I personally use exclusively PBSP 
in my work and never understood a reasons to prefer any other solution. IMO 
the more flexible the solution is - the more users it will end up 
attracting.

Gennadiy