Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 08:09:15

> I see it like this: we are very limited in resources in the library
> working
> group
> and we want to focus on libraries that can be used by as many users as
> possible.
> And that means a policy-based smart pointer is probably not going into the
> standard.

I don't see any grounds to this statement. I personally use exclusively PBSP
in my work and never understood a reasons to prefer any other solution. IMO
the more flexible the solution is - the more users it will end up


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at