From: Iain K. Hanson (iain.hanson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 09:06:41
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 21:10 -0400, Beman Dawes wrote:
> "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > In Lillehammer we rejected a policy-based smart pointer...
> That isn't what happened. The committee's wiki describes the LWG's position:
> "No support for a policy-based framework at this time. This is a refinement
> of Loki, but, while Loki is in use, this refinement isn't. We'll consider
> such a proposal later, if there is widespread practice and strong arguments
> for it."
Is the requirement for a library to be in "widespread" use general for
all libraries or specific to policy_ptr because the TR1 already has
This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk