Re: [boost] Re: como toolset failures

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 15:57:06

Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> BTW why are there two sets of Como results?  It's confusing to know
>> which we should be looking at.
>
> Bronek_A is the one with patch proposed by Peter, ie. added
> flags como-win32 CFLAGS <threading>single :
> -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS ; ... to como-win32-tools.jam . It allows
> shared_ptr to compile. I will remove "Bronek_A" as soon as "Bronek" 
> provides at least as good
> results, that is some fix for shared_ptr is in CVS.

I've just committed this fix to the CVS. Ideally como+vc should allow us to 
pass a #pragma intrinsic statement to the VC backend. Maybe some day. :-)